My stance is that the evidence you’re presenting isn’t convincing unless you believe the Bible. If you want to make it that sure and that tough on yourself then this is what you have to do. You're going to have to work harder than that by exercising your brain through a process called reason and logic. But it's not ever going to be found in the case that modern Skeptics wish which would be to be able to hold up a test tube labeled A and B and point to one and say "here this is why we know God is real" or look at charts and graphs and decide that this line proves God Etc. It is highly complex, it is partial, it is not always completely satisfying either intellectually or emotionally.īut it is good evidence and it is sufficient if not conclusive. In the case of God's existence the evidence is not conclusive. So I cannot give you proof I can only point you to the evidence and it's up to you to evaluate it and decide. If you accept the evidence then you have your proof. In other words proof is subjective and it's based on the evidence. When the jury decides which evidence to accept, that's when it becomes proof. When you go to court the attorneys present *evidence* for one side of the case or the other. "Proof" and evidence are not the same thing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |